Screener
ACES vs APIE
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs ActivePassive International Equity ETF
Key differences
- APIE costs 0.10% less per year.
- APIE is significantly larger than ACES — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACES covers north america markets; APIE covers global.
- ACES follows a index tracking strategy; APIE uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, APIE has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ACES has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACES | APIE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $127M | $1.0B |
| Since | 2018 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.64% | 3.51% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +55.8% | +22.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.1% | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -8.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 32.30% | 16.13% |
| Max drawdown | -79.05% | -15.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACES and APIE
Explore further