Screener
ACES vs APUE
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF
Key differences
- APUE costs 0.24% less per year.
- APUE is significantly larger than ACES — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACES follows a index tracking strategy; APUE uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, APUE has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ACES has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACES | APUE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.31% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $127M | $2.4B |
| Since | 2018 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.64% | 0.79% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +55.8% | +30.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.1% | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | -8.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.00 | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 32.30% | 12.36% |
| Max drawdown | -79.05% | -18.83% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACES and APUE
Explore further