Screener
ACSV vs FAB
American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF vs First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
Key differences
- ACSV costs 0.17% less per year.
- FAB is significantly larger than ACSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACSV follows a active selection strategy; FAB uses index tracking.
- FAB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACSV | FAB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12M | $139M |
| Since | 2025 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +27.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.02% |
| Max drawdown | -7.39% | -47.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACSV and FAB
Explore further