Screener
ACSV vs FNK
American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF vs First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
Key differences
- ACSV costs 0.25% less per year.
- FNK is significantly larger than ACSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACSV follows a active selection strategy; FNK uses index tracking.
- FNK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACSV | FNK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.74% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12M | $217M |
| Since | 2025 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.54% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +21.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.67% |
| Max drawdown | -7.39% | -50.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACSV and FNK
Explore further