Screener
ACSV vs MFSG
American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF vs MFS Active Growth ETF
Key differences
- MFSG is significantly larger than ACSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACSV | MFSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12M | $293M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.08% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +22.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.13% |
| Max drawdown | -7.39% | -23.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACSV and MFSG
Explore further