Screener
ACSV vs QGRO
American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF vs American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF
Key differences
- QGRO costs 0.20% less per year.
- QGRO is significantly larger than ACSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACSV follows a active selection strategy; QGRO uses index enhanced.
- QGRO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACSV | QGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2025 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.20% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +10.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.36% |
| Max drawdown | -7.39% | -32.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACSV and QGRO
Explore further