Screener
ACSV vs XTJA
American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF vs Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - January
Key differences
- ACSV costs 0.30% less per year.
- ACSV is classified as equity, while XTJA is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- ACSV follows a active selection strategy; XTJA uses structured outcome.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACSV | XTJA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12M | $18M |
| Since | 2025 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +22.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 8.61% |
| Max drawdown | -7.39% | -26.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACSV and XTJA
Explore further