Screener
ACWI vs IWB
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Key differences
- IWB costs 0.17% less per year.
- ACWI covers global markets; IWB covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, IWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACWI | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.32% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31.3B | $46.2B |
| Since | 2008 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.45% | 0.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.0% | +29.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.4% | +22.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.9% | +13.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.18 | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.88% | 12.07% |
| Max drawdown | -33.53% | -34.60% |
Similar to ACWI and IWB
Explore further