Screener
ACWV vs ILOW
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF vs AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF
Key differences
- ACWV costs 0.30% less per year.
- ACWV follows a index tracking strategy; ILOW uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACWV | ILOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.3B | $1.7B |
| Since | 2011 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 2.05% | 1.54% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.9% | +13.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.75% | 13.51% |
| Max drawdown | -28.82% | -10.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACWV and ILOW
Explore further