Screener
ACWV vs LOWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF vs AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF
Key differences
- ACWV costs 0.19% less per year.
- ACWV is significantly larger than LOWV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACWV covers global markets; LOWV covers north america.
- ACWV follows a index tracking strategy; LOWV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, LOWV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ACWV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACWV | LOWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.3B | $199M |
| Since | 2011 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.05% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.9% | +13.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.7% | +16.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.75% | 10.56% |
| Max drawdown | -28.82% | -13.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACWV and LOWV
Explore further