Screener
ADIV vs AAXJ
Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF vs iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
- AAXJ costs 0.06% less per year.
- AAXJ is significantly larger than ADIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ADIV follows a active selection strategy; AAXJ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, AAXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ADIV | AAXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55M | $3.8B |
| Since | 2006 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 2.78% | 1.54% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | asia pacific |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.2% | +48.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.1% | +22.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | +6.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.26% | 19.80% |
| Max drawdown | -31.55% | -44.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ADIV and AAXJ
Explore further