Screener
ADIV vs EPP
Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF vs iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF
Key differences
- EPP costs 0.31% less per year.
- EPP is significantly larger than ADIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ADIV follows a active selection strategy; EPP uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, ADIV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EPP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ADIV | EPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2006 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 2.78% | 3.43% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.2% | +19.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.1% | +12.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | +5.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.26% | 14.54% |
| Max drawdown | -31.55% | -39.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ADIV and EPP
Explore further