Screener
ADIV vs ADVE
Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF vs Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF
Key differences
- ADIV is significantly larger than ADVE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ADIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ADIV | ADVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55M | $9M |
| Since | 2006 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.78% | 2.60% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.2% | +38.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.26% | 16.71% |
| Max drawdown | -31.55% | -18.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ADIV and ADVE
Explore further