Screener
ADVE vs DVYA
Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF vs iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF
Key differences
- DVYA costs 0.30% less per year.
- DVYA is significantly larger than ADVE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ADVE follows a active selection strategy; DVYA uses index tracking.
- DVYA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ADVE | DVYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $70M |
| Since | 2023 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.60% | 4.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.4% | +41.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.71% | 13.00% |
| Max drawdown | -18.41% | -45.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ADVE and DVYA
Explore further