Screener
ADIV vs ASIA
Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF vs Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF
Key differences
- ADIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ADIV | ASIA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55M | $50M |
| Since | 2006 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.78% | 0.90% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | asia pacific |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.2% | +55.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.26% | 20.89% |
| Max drawdown | -31.55% | -23.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ADIV and ASIA
Explore further