Screener
ASIA vs DVYA
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF vs iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF
Key differences
- DVYA costs 0.30% less per year.
- ASIA follows a active selection strategy; DVYA uses index tracking.
- DVYA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ASIA | DVYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $50M | $70M |
| Since | 2023 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 4.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +55.9% | +41.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.89% | 13.00% |
| Max drawdown | -23.95% | -45.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ASIA and DVYA
Explore further