Screener
ADIV vs CGDV
Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF vs Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
Key differences
- CGDV costs 0.45% less per year.
- CGDV is significantly larger than ADIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, CGDV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ADIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ADIV | CGDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55M | $33.0B |
| Since | 2006 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.78% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.2% | +33.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.1% | +25.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 1.49 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.26% | 11.75% |
| Max drawdown | -31.55% | -21.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ADIV and CGDV
Explore further