Screener
ADIV vs DGRO
Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF vs iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
Key differences
- DGRO costs 0.70% less per year.
- DGRO is significantly larger than ADIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ADIV follows a active selection strategy; DGRO uses index tracking.
- ADIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ADIV | DGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55M | $39.6B |
| Since | 2006 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 2.78% | 2.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.2% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.1% | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | +10.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.26% | 9.59% |
| Max drawdown | -31.55% | -35.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ADIV and DGRO
Explore further