Screener
DGRO vs DIVS
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF vs Guinness Atkinson Dividend Builder ETF
Key differences
- DGRO costs 0.37% less per year.
- DGRO is significantly larger than DIVS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DGRO covers north america markets; DIVS covers global.
- DGRO follows a index tracking strategy; DIVS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, DGRO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DGRO | DIVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39.6B | $39M |
| Since | 2014 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.00% | 1.75% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +11.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | +12.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.6% | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.59% | 10.54% |
| Max drawdown | -35.10% | -29.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DGRO and DIVS
Explore further