Screener
ADIV vs GENW
Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF vs Genter Capital International Dividend ETF
Key differences
- GENW costs 0.40% less per year.
- ADIV is significantly larger than GENW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ADIV follows a active selection strategy; GENW uses index tracking.
- ADIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ADIV | GENW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55M | $5M |
| Since | 2006 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.78% | 2.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.2% | +31.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.26% | 13.78% |
| Max drawdown | -31.55% | -14.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ADIV and GENW
Explore further