Screener
ADIV vs GEND
Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF vs Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF
Key differences
- GEND costs 0.40% less per year.
- ADIV is significantly larger than GEND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ADIV is classified as equity, while GEND is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- ADIV follows a active selection strategy; GEND uses option income.
- ADIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ADIV | GEND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55M | $4M |
| Since | 2006 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.78% | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.2% | +29.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.26% | 10.70% |
| Max drawdown | -31.55% | -6.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ADIV and GEND
Explore further