Screener
DVYA vs MINV
iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF vs Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF
Key differences
- DVYA costs 0.30% less per year.
- DVYA follows a index tracking strategy; MINV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, MINV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DVYA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DVYA | MINV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $70M | $143M |
| Since | 2012 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 4.31% | 1.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.3% | +81.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.3% | +31.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.00% | 24.43% |
| Max drawdown | -45.61% | -23.49% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DVYA and MINV
Explore further