Screener
DVYA vs ADIV
iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF vs Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF
Key differences
- DVYA costs 0.29% less per year.
- DVYA follows a index tracking strategy; ADIV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, DVYA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ADIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DVYA | ADIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $70M | $55M |
| Since | 2012 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 4.31% | 2.78% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.3% | +19.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.3% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.6% | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.00% | 13.26% |
| Max drawdown | -45.61% | -31.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DVYA and ADIV
Explore further