Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ADVE vs MEMX

Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF vs Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF

ADVE

Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF

Matthews Asia Funds

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$9M

MEMX

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF

Matthews Asia Funds

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$45M

Key differences

  • MEMX is significantly larger than ADVE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

ADVEMEMX
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.79%
Fund size (AUM)$9M$45M
Since20232023
Dividend yield2.60%1.72%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+38.4%+62.2%
CAGR 3YN/A+25.6%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/A1.20
Volatility 1Y16.71%21.07%
Max drawdown-18.41%-19.27%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to ADVE and MEMX