Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MEMX vs MCH

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF vs Matthews China Active ETF

MEMX

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF

Matthews Asia Funds

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$45M

MCH

Matthews China Active ETF

Matthews Asia Funds

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$22M

Key differences

  • Over the last 3 years, MEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

MEMXMCH
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.79%
Fund size (AUM)$45M$22M
Since20232022
Dividend yield1.72%1.78%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+62.2%+24.3%
CAGR 3Y+25.6%+11.2%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y1.200.39
Volatility 1Y21.07%19.91%
Max drawdown-19.27%-40.53%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to MEMX and MCH