Screener
MEMX vs MINV
Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF vs Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF
Key differences
- MINV is significantly larger than MEMX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MEMX covers emerging markets markets; MINV covers asia pacific.
- Over the last 3 years, MINV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MEMX | MINV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $45M | $143M |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.72% | 1.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +62.2% | +81.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.6% | +31.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.07% | 24.43% |
| Max drawdown | -19.27% | -23.49% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MEMX and MINV
Explore further