Screener
AFMC vs PSC
First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF vs Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- PSC costs 0.30% less per year.
- PSC is significantly larger than AFMC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AFMC follows a active selection strategy; PSC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, AFMC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| AFMC | PSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $153M | $2.0B |
| Since | 2019 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.81% | 0.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.2% | +28.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.8% | +18.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.2% | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.96% | 18.83% |
| Max drawdown | -42.14% | -46.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AFMC and PSC
Explore further