Screener
AGIX vs LRNZ
KraneShares Artificial Intelligence and Technology ETF vs TrueShares Technology, AI and Deep Learning ETF
Key differences
- LRNZ costs 0.30% less per year.
- AGIX is significantly larger than LRNZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AGIX follows a index tracking strategy; LRNZ uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| AGIX | LRNZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $340M | $31M |
| Since | 2024 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +59.2% | +35.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.83% | 27.41% |
| Max drawdown | -31.48% | -61.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AGIX and LRNZ
Explore further