Screener
ASGM vs AAVM
Virtus Alphasimplex Global Macro Etf vs Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF
Key differences
- AAVM costs 0.48% less per year.
- AAVM is significantly larger than ASGM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ASGM is classified as alternative, while AAVM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- ASGM follows a systematic alpha strategy; AAVM uses active selection.
- AAVM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ASGM | AAVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.86% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $24M |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.79% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +34.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.23% |
| Max drawdown | -6.62% | -34.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ASGM and AAVM
Explore further