Screener
AGOX vs MATE
Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF vs Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF
Key differences
Both AGOX and MATE are alternative ETFs. AGOX charges 1.33% a year and MATE 0.97%. The main difference: AGOX follows a active selection strategy; MATE uses tactical allocation.
- AGOX follows a active selection strategy; MATE uses tactical allocation.
- MATE costs 0.36% less per year.
- AGOX is much larger than MATE. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- AGOX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AGOX | MATE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.33% | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $387M | $39M |
| Since | 2012 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.45% | — |
| Max drawdown | -27.72% | -13.24% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.