Screener
MATE vs XNAV
Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- MATE costs 0.30% less per year.
- MATE follows a tactical allocation strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MATE | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.97% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $37M | $31M |
| Since | 2025 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.51% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.40% |
| Max drawdown | -13.24% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MATE and XNAV
Explore further