Screener
RWJ vs PSCF
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF
Key differences
- PSCF costs 0.10% less per year.
- RWJ is significantly larger than PSCF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PSCF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RWJ | PSCF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.8B | $25M |
| Since | 2008 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 1.02% | 2.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.3% | +21.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.6% | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.8% | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.64 | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.60% | 17.56% |
| Max drawdown | -51.33% | -45.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RWJ and PSCF
Explore further