Screener
AIQ vs RIFR
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF vs Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- RIFR costs 0.09% less per year.
- AIQ is significantly larger than RIFR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AIQ covers north america markets; RIFR covers global.
- AIQ follows a index tracking strategy; RIFR uses active selection.
- AIQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AIQ | RIFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.6B | $42M |
| Since | 2018 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.17% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +63.3% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +37.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.35 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.80% | 10.40% |
| Max drawdown | -44.66% | -6.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AIQ and RIFR
Explore further