Screener
AMZD vs TNA
Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares vs Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
Key differences
- TNA is significantly larger than AMZD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AMZD follows a inverse strategy; TNA uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, TNA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- TNA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMZD | TNA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.02% | 1.05% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2022 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 3.64% | 0.44% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -26.3% | +130.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | -26.1% | +30.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -5.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.94 | 0.68 |
| Volatility 1Y | 29.78% | 57.15% |
| Max drawdown | -73.05% | -88.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AMZD and TNA
Explore further