Skip to content
Screener

INRO vs DYNF

iShares U.S. Industry Rotation Active ETF vs iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF

INRO

iShares U.S. Industry Rotation Active ETF

Annual cost

0.42%

Fund size

$33M

DYNF

iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF

Annual cost

0.26%

Fund size

$36.7B

Key differences

Both INRO and DYNF are equity ETFs. INRO charges 0.42% a year and DYNF 0.26%. The main difference: DYNF costs 0.16% less per year.

  • DYNF costs 0.16% less per year.
  • DYNF is much larger than INRO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • DYNF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

INRODYNF
Annual cost (TER)0.42%0.26%
Fund size (AUM)$33M$36.7B
Since20242019
Dividend yield0.65%0.89%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+25.5%+24.4%
CAGR 3YN/A+24.6%
CAGR 5YN/A+14.8%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.25
Volatility 1Y13.27%12.87%
Max drawdown-20.02%-34.72%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to INRO and DYNF