Screener
ANEW vs URTH
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF vs iShares MSCI World ETF
Key differences
Both ANEW and URTH are equity ETFs. ANEW charges 0.45% a year and URTH 0.24%. The main difference: URTH costs 0.21% less per year.
- URTH costs 0.21% less per year.
- URTH is much larger than ANEW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, URTH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- URTH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ANEW | URTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $8.1B |
| Since | 2020 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | 1.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.8% | +23.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.8% | +21.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | +11.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.47% | 12.34% |
| Max drawdown | -39.87% | -34.01% |
Similar to ANEW and URTH
Explore further