Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ANEW vs XNAV

ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF

ANEW

ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF

Annual cost

0.45%

Fund size

$8M

XNAV

FundX Aggressive ETF

Annual cost

1.27%

Fund size

$34M

Key differences

ANEW is an equity ETF, while XNAV is an alternative ETF. ANEW charges 0.45% a year and XNAV 1.27%.

  • ANEW is an equity fund, while XNAV is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • ANEW follows a index tracking strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
  • ANEW costs 0.82% less per year.
  • XNAV is much larger than ANEW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

ANEWXNAV
Annual cost (TER)0.45%1.27%
Fund size (AUM)$8M$34M
Since20202002
Dividend yield0.61%0.47%
Asset classequityalternative
Region
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+2.8%+36.3%
CAGR 3Y+13.8%+24.0%
CAGR 5Y+3.5%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.681.03
Volatility 1Y13.47%17.40%
Max drawdown-39.87%-24.27%

Similar to ANEW and XNAV