Screener
ANGL vs VRIG
VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
Key differences
- ANGL follows a index tracking strategy; VRIG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, ANGL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ANGL | VRIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.1B | $1.5B |
| Since | 2012 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 6.31% | 4.86% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +9.1% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.8% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.7% | +4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | 2.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.34% | 0.50% |
| Max drawdown | -29.31% | -13.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ANGL and VRIG
Explore further