Screener
ANGL vs PFIG
VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF vs Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- ANGL is significantly larger than PFIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ANGL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ANGL | PFIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.22% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.1B | $113M |
| Since | 2012 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 6.31% | 4.37% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +9.1% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.8% | +5.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.7% | +1.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | 0.40 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.34% | 3.09% |
| Max drawdown | -29.31% | -15.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ANGL and PFIG
Explore further