Screener
AOM vs BDYN
iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF vs iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- AOM costs 0.25% less per year.
- AOM follows a index tracking strategy; BDYN uses active selection.
- AOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AOM | BDYN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $2.7B |
| Since | 2008 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 3.04% | 0.96% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.55% | — |
| Max drawdown | -19.96% | -10.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AOM and BDYN
Explore further