Screener
AOM vs BFLX
iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF vs iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- AOM costs 0.25% less per year.
- AOM is classified as mixed asset, while BFLX is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- AOM follows a index tracking strategy; BFLX uses active selection.
- AOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AOM | BFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | — |
| Since | 2008 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 3.04% | — |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.55% | — |
| Max drawdown | -19.96% | 0.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AOM and BFLX
Explore further