Screener
AOM vs INMU
iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF vs iShares Intermediate Muni Income Active ETF
Key differences
AOM is a mixed asset ETF, while INMU is a fixed income ETF. AOM charges 0.15% a year and INMU 0.30%.
- AOM is a mixed asset fund, while INMU is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- AOM follows a index tracking strategy; INMU uses active selection.
- AOM costs 0.15% less per year.
- AOM is much larger than INMU. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, AOM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AOM | INMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.8B | $489M |
| Since | 2008 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 2.98% | 3.39% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.4% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.9% | +4.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.8% | +1.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | 0.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.90% | 2.48% |
| Max drawdown | -19.96% | -10.66% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.