Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

AOM vs IWL

iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 ETF

AOM

iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$1.7B

IWL

iShares Russell Top 200 ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$2.1B

Key differences

  • AOM is classified as mixed asset, while IWL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
  • Over the last 3 years, IWL has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

AOMIWL
Annual cost (TER)0.15%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$1.7B$2.1B
Since20082009
Dividend yield3.04%0.86%
Asset classmixed assetequity
Regionnorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+15.2%+30.1%
CAGR 3Y+10.8%+24.4%
CAGR 5Y+4.9%+14.7%
Sharpe 3Y0.961.28
Volatility 1Y6.55%12.34%
Max drawdown-19.96%-32.71%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to AOM and IWL