Screener
AOM vs QVOY
iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF vs Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF
Key differences
- AOM costs 1.17% less per year.
- AOM is significantly larger than QVOY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AOM follows a index tracking strategy; QVOY uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, QVOY has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AOM | QVOY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 1.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $60M |
| Since | 2008 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 3.04% | 0.52% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.5% | +25.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.0% | +12.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | 0.60 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.58% | 17.56% |
| Max drawdown | -19.96% | -17.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AOM and QVOY
Explore further