Screener
APIE vs ACES
ActivePassive International Equity ETF vs ALPS Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- APIE costs 0.10% less per year.
- APIE is significantly larger than ACES — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- APIE covers global markets; ACES covers north america.
- APIE follows a active selection strategy; ACES uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, APIE has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ACES has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| APIE | ACES | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $127M |
| Since | 2023 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 3.51% | 0.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.7% | +55.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | -2.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.13% | 32.30% |
| Max drawdown | -15.94% | -79.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to APIE and ACES
Explore further