Screener
APOC vs SPDF
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Apr/Oct vs Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF
Key differences
- SPDF costs 0.10% less per year.
- APOC is significantly larger than SPDF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- APOC is classified as alternative, while SPDF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- APOC follows a structured outcome strategy; SPDF uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| APOC | SPDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $80M | $5M |
| Since | 2024 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.64% | — |
| Max drawdown | -4.17% | -1.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to APOC and SPDF
Explore further