Screener
APUE vs CCNR
ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF vs ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- APUE costs 0.08% less per year.
- APUE is significantly larger than CCNR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- APUE covers north america markets; CCNR covers global.
Side-by-side comparison
| APUE | CCNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.31% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.4B | $394M |
| Since | 2023 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.79% | 2.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.2% | +72.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.36% | 17.69% |
| Max drawdown | -18.83% | -20.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to APUE and CCNR
Explore further