Screener
APUE vs ACES
ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF vs ALPS Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- APUE costs 0.24% less per year.
- APUE is significantly larger than ACES — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- APUE follows a active selection strategy; ACES uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, APUE has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ACES has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| APUE | ACES | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.31% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.4B | $127M |
| Since | 2023 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.79% | 0.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.2% | +55.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.9% | -2.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | 0.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.36% | 32.30% |
| Max drawdown | -18.83% | -79.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to APUE and ACES
Explore further