Screener
AQWA vs RIFR
Global X Clean Water ETF vs Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- AQWA costs 0.09% less per year.
- AQWA follows a index tracking strategy; RIFR uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| AQWA | RIFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $42M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.41% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.5% | +16.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.45 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.38% | 10.46% |
| Max drawdown | -29.44% | -6.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AQWA and RIFR
Explore further