Screener
ASCI vs HSCZ
abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF vs iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- HSCZ costs 0.27% less per year.
- ASCI follows a active selection strategy; HSCZ uses index tracking.
- ASCI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ASCI | HSCZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.43% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $85M | $208M |
| Since | 2009 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.75% | 3.04% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +31.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 11.28% |
| Max drawdown | -11.22% | -34.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ASCI and HSCZ
Explore further